Extra entries for JavaScript auto complete(intellisense) make no sense

<!-- BUGS: Please use this template. --> <!-- QUESTIONS: This is not a general support forum! Ask Qs at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/typescript --> <!-- SUGGESTIONS: See https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript-wiki/blob/master/Writing-Good-Design-Proposals.md --> **TypeScript Version:** 2.2.1 / nightly (2.2.0-dev.201xxxxx) **Code** The following code in javascript: ```js /** * @param {MessageActivity} activity * @param {IConversationContext} context */ export function Prompt_beforeResponse(activity, context) { // MessageActivity is defined in typescript definition provided to the editor as having 4 properties (attachements, text, speak, type). // Typing activity. will show those for properties but also: // activity - why should activity be under itself? // context - why should the second parameter be under activity? // IConversationContext - why would a type, that is not a property in any object be under activity? // MessageActivity - same question as above // onRun - why should a global function be under activity // Prompt_when - same as above // Prompt_beforeResponse - same question as above and this is the function itself // Here is another example. obj. should display only a and b, but it also shows activity, context, MessageActivity, IConversationContext, etc. /** * @type {{a: number, b: string }} */ var obj = {}; obj. } ``` ```ts // A *self-contained* demonstration of the problem follows... ``` **Expected behavior:** When a javascript type is not "any", i.e. when it is definded in jsdoc or in the typescript definition helper (See https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/JavaScript-Language-Service-in-Visual-Studio#unsupported-patterns) only those defined members should be part of intellisense. Even if the type is any, throwing everything on intellisense like that defeats the purpose of finding out what reasonably could be under the object. **Actual behavior:** A bunch of extra e…